Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Zehnle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1947No. 11536PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals from a judgment, based upon the jury’s verdict, for $20,000 for the negligent killing by defendant of the father of appellee, a minor child suing through his guardian ad litem, the plaintiff below.

Appellant made no objection to the trial judge’s instruction to the jury that

“Pecuniary loss may be either a loss arising from the deprivation of something to which the plaintiff would have been legally entitled if his father had lived, or a loss arising from a deprivation of benefits which from all the circumstances of the particular case,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Gerald E. Williams, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. FotopulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API