Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Hurley
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided March 2, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-0231-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN M. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Terry Fuller and United Coal Company, have brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of plaintiff Fuller’s constitutional rights through the operation of Virginia’s attachment statute. Specifically, plaintiffs state that Fuller’s right to procedural due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution has been violated. In addition, they argue that Virginia’s attachment statute 1 violates 15 U.S.C. § 1673 2 and is therefore void under Article VI, cl. 2 of the United States…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rose Dionne, Etc. v. Gerard Bouley, Etc., Rose Dionne, Etc. v. Gerard Bouley, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Del's Big Saver Foods, Inc., Burdell Robish, and Janis Robish v. Carpenter Cook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986