Legal Opinion

State v. Bickford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1998No. Z397321; CA A97503PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The state assigns error to the trial court’s finding that the officer lacked subjective probable cause to arrest defendant. Because the tried court’s finding was based on an incorrect legal standard, we reverse and remand.

On November 16,1996, Officer Maul cited defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). Defendant filed a motion to suppress any evidence regarding the field sobriety tests (FSTs) and the Intoxilyzer…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. CoenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. GetzelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API