Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Schupp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for St. Croix County. The plaintiff brought this action as assignee of one John Hennessy, to recover an unpaid balance for work and labor alleged in the complaint to have been done by the latter for the defendants as partners, between October 1, 1815,'and March 27, 1876, in and about the cutting and hauling of certain pine saw-logs.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for St. Croix County. The plaintiff brought this action as assignee of one John Hennessy, to recover an unpaid balance for work and labor alleged in the complaint to have been done by the latter for the defendants as partners, between October 1, 1815,'and March 27, 1876, in and about the cutting and hauling of certain pine saw-logs. It is alleged that the labor was performed at the special instance and request of the defendants; also that one McDonald had charge of the work for the defendants, and employed the men for them to do it, and that the defendants…

1Opinion of the CourtLyoN, J.

1. The question whether, after Hennessy lmd performed the labor on the logs got out by McDonald, the defendants promised to pay him the balance due therefor, was not submitted to the jury. The learned circuit judge in his charge'made the case turn entirely upon the quéstion whether the defendants promised Hennessy before he did the work, either personally or through the authorized agency of McDonald, to pay him therefor. This is equivalent to a ruling that there was not sufficient testimony to go to the jury tending to show such promise after the work was done. McDonald testified that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. Wisconsin Valley RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Weisel v. SpenceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Young v. FrenchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ralph v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Nash v. HoxieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. DickensonSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
  3. Lindley v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Anderson v. Horlick's Malted Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hart-Parr Co. v. Krizan MalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API