Nash v. Hoxie
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Brown County. * The facts are stated in the opinion. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs, and from the judgment entered thereon the, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.
The contract was that the plaintiffs, as partners, should saw at their mills at the city of New London, during the sawing season of 1881, for the defendants, as partners, 1,000,000 feet of basswood and elm logs, and 50,000 feet of oak logs, to be delivered at the plaintiffs’ mill for that *385purpose by the defendants, for and in consideration oí $2.15 per thousand feet for the basswood and elm logs, and of $3.15 per thousand feet for the oak logs, to be paid when the sawing was done, in cash, except the sum of $300, which was to be paid by the delivery of 100,000 feet of hemlock logs at the rate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dreher v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Nilson v. MorseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Pinney v. GleasonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- Smith v. DunlapIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
- Ganson v. MadiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cumberland Tel'p & Tel'g Co. v. OverfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Teff v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Rogers v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cameron v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- The People v. KrotzIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.