Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 6, 1997No. 95-2935PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

We consider in this appeal the extent to which an employer must accommodate its employees’ religious practices under Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l). Lyudmila Tomilina and Ali-na Glukhovsky were employed by defendant Ilona of Hungary, Inc. (“Ilona”) in its Chicago beauty salon, Tomilina as a manicurist and Glukhovsky as a skin care specialist or “esthetician.” Tomilina and Glukhovsky are Jewish, and both asked to take the day off without pay on Saturday, September 29, 1990, in order to observe Yom Kippur, a Jewish holy day.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry IvesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. Latice Porter v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API