Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff herein seeks to recover certain monies claimed to have been illegally exacted on certain merchandise imported from England and entered at the port of Boston. The merchandise is described on the invoices as 4,942 “reels Rayophane transparent cellulose film, heat sealing moistureproof 2%6" wide — 3" centres.” It was classified for duty under paragraph 31 (b) (1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 40 cents per pound under the provision for “All compounds of cellulose * * * In blocks, sheets, rods, tubes, powder, flakes, briquets, or other forms * * * not made into…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
3Cited by26 opinions
- Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.