Legal Opinion

Kuk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1992No. CR 91-170PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for post-conviction relief that was filed pursuant to Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. (now Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.).

In April 1988, Jerome Peter Kuk, the appellant, was convicted for the murder of William Dillow. He was sentenced to 99 years' imprisonment, was fined $20,000, and was ordered to pay $4,000 in restitution. No direct appeal was taken from that conviction and sentence. The record currently before this Court does not contain the history of the appellant's post-conviction proceedings. However, in an earlier appeal involving the same petition now…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ZiglarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Rolling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Straughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. State v. VoigtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API