Legal Opinion
State v. Voigt
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2007No. 20060271PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Shane Voigt appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) to gross sexual imposition. We conclude double jeopardy bars prosecution of Voigt for this charge, and we reverse and remand to allow him the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea.
I
[¶ 2] On August 4, 2004, Voigt was charged with gross sexual imposition and an attorney was appointed to represent him. At a change of plea hearing on Sep tember 23, 2005, Voigt stated he did not want to change his plea, he no longer wanted his court-appointed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nathan Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Ubben v. O.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- City of West Fargo v. EkstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. ByzewskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Day v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.