Runstrom v. Alaska Native Medical Center
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A healthcare worker was sprayed in the eye with fluids from an HIV-positive patient. She received preventive treatment and counseling. Her employer initially paid workers compensation benefits; it later filed a contr-oversion based on its doctor's opinion that the employee was able to return to work. The employee asked for more benefits, but the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board denied her claim. The employee appealed, but the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission affirmed the Board's decision. Because we agree with the Commission that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Doe v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Cora G. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS, Justin D. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Sosa de Rosario v. Chenega LodgingAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Shannon K. Patterson v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Ge Vue v. Walmart Associates, INC., and New Hampshire Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.