James v. Kemper Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed a referee’s order upholding the insurer’s denial of payment for chiropractic services in excess of those provided for by OAR 436-69-201(2)(a).1 On de novo review, ORS 656.298, we affirm.
In July, 1982, claimant was injured while employed by General Foods. She was treated by Dr. Buttler, a chiropractor. In March, 1983, a determination order found that she was medically stationary and awarded her temporary total disability. Nevertheless, her physician felt that she would benefit from ongoing chiropractic…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wetzel v. Goodwin Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- McGarry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- West v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freres Lumber Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990