Legal Opinion

James v. Kemper Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 3, 1986No. WCB 83-07472, 83-08033; CA A36959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed a referee’s order upholding the insurer’s denial of payment for chiropractic services in excess of those provided for by OAR 436-69-201(2)(a).1 On de novo review, ORS 656.298, we affirm.

In July, 1982, claimant was injured while employed by General Foods. She was treated by Dr. Buttler, a chiropractor. In March, 1983, a determination order found that she was medically stationary and awarded her temporary total disability. Nevertheless, her physician felt that she would benefit from ongoing chiropractic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. Goodwin Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. McGarry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. West v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freres Lumber Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API