Legal Opinion
Tepper v. Ross
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 24, 1938No. 4433PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This bill in equity was brought under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C.A. § 70, to secure injunctive relief and an accounting. The defendant does not deny the validity of the patent. The sole question raised is whether the defendant can be charged with infringement.
Statement of Facts
1. Letters Patent of the United States No. 2,064,232, were issued to the plaintiff December 15, 1936, upon his application filed March 11, 1933. The patent relates to an improvement in easels, one of the novel features being adjustable means for holding the canvas in place…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Booth v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Kalten-BachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Ralston Purina Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1971