Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 1, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dyer, D. J.,

The defendants have been convicted, under section 5430 of the Revised Statutes, of the offense of having in their possession an obligation engraved and printed after the similitude of an obligation issued under the authority of the United States, with intent to sell or otherwise use the same. A motion for a new trial has been argued and is now to be decided. It was shown on the trial, *551by the testimony of a bank expert, that the instrument which the defendants had in their possession and attempted to exchange for money resembles in color, style of printing and engraving, and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. United States v. MorrowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1827

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. KuhlDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1898
  2. United States v. WeberDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
  3. Metropolitan Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. National Surety Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
  4. Leib v. HalliganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. United States v. BeebeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API