Legal Opinion
United States v. Kuhl
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided February 19, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions
On motion to quash indictment against Matthew Kuhl for having in his possession an instrument in the similitude of a bank note or hill of the United States.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSON, District Judge.
The indictment is based upon that portion of section 5430, Rev. St., which provides that:
“Every person * “ * 'who has in his possession or custody, except under authority from the secretary of the treasury or other proper officer, any obligation, or other security, engraved and printed after the similitude of any obligation or other security issued under the authority of the United States, with intent to sell or otherwise use the same, * * * shall be punished,” etc.
The “obligation” with whose unlawful possession defendant is charged is shown by the indictment to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Melvin TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Kenneth HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Calvin BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BarrettDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1901
- Leib v. HalliganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.