Legal Opinion
United States v. Weber
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 17, 1913No. 2385PublishedCited by 10 opinions
James C. Weber was indicted for having in possession an .obligation, after the similitude of an obligation or security issued under authority of the United States, with intent to sell and use the same. On demurrer to indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, District Judge.
The indictment in this case was returned under section 150 of the Criminal Code of March 4, 1909, which provides, in part, as follows:
“Whoever shall have in his possession or custody, except under authority from the Secretary of the Treasury or other proper officer, any obligation or other security made or executed, in Whole or in part, after the similitude of any obligation or other security issued under the authority of the United States, with intent to sell or otherwise use the same” shall be fined and imprisoned, etc.
The indictment charges, in substance, that on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ConnersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1901
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1882
- United States v. BarrettDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1901
- United States v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1898
- United States v. StevensDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Melvin TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert Arley JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Charles Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. LustigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Larry Otis Cantwell, United States of America v. James Arthur HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.