Legal Opinion

In Re Pilcher's Estate. Von Pilcher v. Pilcher

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1948No. 7145Published

1Concurrence

WADE, Justice.

I concur. But I find much confusion in the decisions both of this and other courts as to the effect of a presumption. In the hope of clarifying some of these matters, I add this opinion.

The prevailing opinion recognizes that a presumption may have the effect of requiring the party, who claims the facts are contrary to such presumption, to not only produce some evidence that such is the fact, but also to persuade the trier of the facts not only by a mere preponderance of the evidence but by clear, convincing and conclusive evidence. This court has often said that a presumption…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Walton v. Koffman Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. BarrettaUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ryan v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API