Legal Opinion

State v. Barretta

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1916No. 2779PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. JRitchie, Judge. • Victor Barretta, Joe Melea, and another were indicted for larceny, and, the last two defendants being convicted, they appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

STRAUP, C. J,

The three defendants, Barretta, Melea, and Tomljenovich, were, by the information, jointly charged with the larceny of a steer. We shall refer to them as B., M., and T. The •case was proceeded against the last two named defendants only, who were convicted and appeal.

T., with others as partners, was engaged in the butcher ■business at Tooele. M. resided at Stockton, in the same county. He had resided there about five years. His business was that •of a miner and leaser. He also traded horses, bought and sold cows, and did some butchering. B. was in his employ. About a week before…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. . Van GaasbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. GrateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  5. Gifford v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. KinseyUtah Supreme Court · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API