Inman v. Brown
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition to set aside an execution sale for alleged irregularities. Neither fraud nor mistake is pleaded. The sole question is whether the irregularities are such as would invalidate the sale.
Appellee Inman and T. Betenbough were sureties on the supersedeas bond of appellant and her husband Lynn Brown in an action pending in Lea County wherein Henry Reid recovered judgment against the Browns in the amount of $2,101.85. On appeal to this Court the judgment was affirmed. Reid v. Brown, 56 N.M. 65, 240 P.2d 213.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reid v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Rowe's Adm'r v. Habdy's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Robinson v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Preissman v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- State v. AdamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtis v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Gonzalez v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Columbus Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Bird v. LankfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Curtis v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983