Legal Opinion
Young v. Halle Housing Associates, L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 7, 2001No. 00 Civ. 0567(GEL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Simone Young, Nathaniel Haynes, Antonio Perez, Anibal Torres and Victor Hawkins are residents of a privately owned and operated supportive-housing single room occupancy facility located at 510 Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn New York (the “Muhlenberg”). Plaintiffs were tenants at the Muhlenberg prior to its transformation into supportive housing. 1 They bring this action under 42 § U.S.C. 1983 alleging that the Muhlenberg’s prohibition of overnight guests violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and several…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Taub v. Hershkowitz (In Re Taub)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Kabbani v. Council House, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2005
- In Re MarcanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- David Lovell v. Bay Area Community Services, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Hall v. Crestwood Lake Section 8 Holding CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.