Legal Opinion

In re IMAX Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 2010No. 06 Civ. 6128 (NRB)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*141MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.

This is a securities fraud class action under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j and 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or acquired common stock in IMAX Corporation (“IMAX” or “the Company”) on the NASDAQ between February 27, 2003 and July 27, 2007 (“the Class Period”).1 Plaintiffs allege that the defendants, IMAX, Richard L. Gelfond, Bradley J. Wechsler, Francis T. Joyce, and Kathryn A. Gamble (collectively, the “IMAX defendants”), and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Topping v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. In re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund v. Residential Capital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API