Legal Opinion

Seegmiller v. County of Nevada

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1997No. C024799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALLAHAN, J.

Plaintiff Richard Seegmiller, a taxpayer whose business property was located in the County of Nevada (the County) as of the statutory assessment lien date, sought a partial refund of ad valorem property taxes when he relocated to another state during the next fiscal tax year. The County denied the claim and the trial court sustained a demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend.

On appeal, Seegmiller claims that County’s refusal to prorate or apportion his tax liability based on the actual time the property was located in this state violates the due process, equal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Flying Dutchman Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Kenai Peninsula Borough v. ArndtAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API