Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The plaintiff in error sued out a warrant against the city of Richmond, alleging negligence and resulting damages to certain real estate inundated by defective water pipes owned and operated by the city of Richmond.

The defendant moved the dismission of the warrant because no verified written statement of the claim had been furnished the city attorney within six months of the injury complained of, relying upon the requirement of section 19g of the charter of the city, as amended, Acts 1918, page 182. This motion was sustained, first by the trial justice, and then by the trial court, on appeal,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Curry v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Whitlock v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  4. Sheehy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. Medical Center HospitalsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Lunday Ex Rel. Lunday v. VogelmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Town of Crewe v. MarlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. City of Portsmouth v. WeissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API