Legal Opinion

Cuevas v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1976No. Civ. 2893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the Stanislaus County Superior Court from taking any further proceedings against petitioners on the ground that their motion to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) was denied erroneously by Judge Frank Pierson because petitioners were prevented from challenging a search warrant pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 at the preliminary hearing. All evidence produced at the hearing came from the execution of a search warrant issued by Judge Pierson; petitioners allege that they have valid grounds for a motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. MardianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Stewart v. Chevron Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API