Ex parte Bustillos
New Mexico Supreme Court
Application by Ramon Bustillos and others for a writ of habeas corpus. The restraining order of the district court is ineffective insofar as it attempts to affect petitions. A. Because Edward Safford was not a proper party plaintiff. Peeples v. Byrd, 98 Ga. 693; Birmingham v. Cheetham, 19 Wash. 659; Givens v. McElroy, 79 Mo.
Read the full summary
Application by Ramon Bustillos and others for a writ of habeas corpus. The restraining order of the district court is ineffective insofar as it attempts to affect petitions. A. Because Edward Safford was not a proper party plaintiff. Peeples v. Byrd, 98 Ga. 693; Birmingham v. Cheetham, 19 Wash. 659; Givens v. McElroy, 79 Mo. App. 671; School District v. Shaddock, 25 Kans. 467; Mechem, Public Officers, Secs. 954-987-988. B. Because the petitioners were not parties to the suit. State v. Anderson, 5 Kans. 90; Jeffries v. Nation, 65 Pac. 226; Walker v. Cambern, 47 Pac. 980; Case v. Minot, 158…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
PARKER, C. J.
The petitioners in this proceeding are persons commonly known and designated as “the Yillistas. ’ ’ They derived this designation from the commonly reputed fact that they were members of a marauding band of Mexicans, who, under the leadership of one Francisco Villa, the notorious bandit of Mexico, crossed the international boundary line on March 9, 1916, and attacked the town of Columbus, in Luna county, in this state, and killed a number of our citizens without any conceivable cause or provocation. Had the petitioners been members of the army of any…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Mahon v. JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex Parte WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Bales v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Woodward v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MondragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Magee Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- King v. Board of Regents of the University of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.