Legal Opinion
Dempski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs’ discovery motion seeking to compel production of all pleadings against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) “in actions seeking to set aside Releases for cases brought in the [Eighth] Judicial *896District of New York State from 1988 to present” and letters sent to State Farm claim offices in the Eighth Judicial District from 1990 to the present asserting that State Farm representatives…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Crazytown Furniture, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Conrad v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mardiros v. GhalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Senior v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Litvinov v. HodsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- KREGG, CHARLOTTE v. MALDONADO, EILEENAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kregg v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kregg v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013