Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion to compel defendants (collectively, Dr. Park) to attend a further deposition limited to inquiry regarding a B-scan of the retina of plaintiffs right eye performed by another physician six months before Dr. Park’s performance of the same test. The earlier B-scan is relevant with respect to plaintiff’s contentions that Dr. Park failed to perform appropriate diagnostic tests timely and failed to diagnose a retinal detachment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Kenford Co. v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. McGuane v. M.C.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Harley v. Catholic Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ocasio v. AmtrakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Coddington v. LiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Forgays v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Jordan v. Blue Circle Atlantic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Luce v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API