Denman v. Carroll Cty. Dog Warden
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Denman v. Carroll Cty. Dog Warden,
2022-Ohio-2081.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY AMBER DENMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARROLL COUNTY DOG WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 21 CA 0951 Civil Appeal from the Municipal Court of Carroll County, Ohio Case No. CVF 2100117 BEFORE: Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, David A. D’Apolito, Judges. JUDGMENT: Affirmed Atty. DanaMarie K. Pannella, Holland & Muirden, 1343 Sharon-Copley Rod, P.O. Box 345, Sharon Center, Ohio 44274, for Plaintiff-Appellant and Atty. Steven D.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Spangler v. Stark Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ali v. Lucas Cnty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tate v. Butler Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024