Legal Opinion

Denman v. Carroll Cty. Dog Warden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 2022No. 21 CA 0951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Denman v. Carroll Cty. Dog Warden,

2022-Ohio-2081.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY AMBER DENMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARROLL COUNTY DOG WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 21 CA 0951 Civil Appeal from the Municipal Court of Carroll County, Ohio Case No. CVF 2100117 BEFORE: Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, David A. D’Apolito, Judges. JUDGMENT: Affirmed Atty. DanaMarie K. Pannella, Holland & Muirden, 1343 Sharon-Copley Rod, P.O. Box 345, Sharon Center, Ohio 44274, for Plaintiff-Appellant and Atty. Steven D.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Spangler v. Stark Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Ali v. Lucas Cnty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tate v. Butler Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API