Legal Opinion
Ali v. Lucas Cnty. Dog Warden
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 2017No. L-16-1274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMayle, J.
{¶ 1} Respondent-appellant is the Lucas County Dog Warden ("the warden"). The petitioner-appellee is George Ali. Ali appealed to the Toledo Municipal Court after the warden designated his dog a "vicious dog" as defined by R.C. 955.11(A)(6)(a). In an order dated October 17, 2016, the municipal court adopted a magistrate's decision which granted Ali's appeal and rescinded the "vicious dog" designation. The warden appealed. For the following reasons, we affirm the municipal court judgment.
I. Background
{¶ 2} On January 24, 2016, Mi.S ("father") and Ma.S. ("mother") took their children,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Holbrock v. Hamilton Distributing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Hunter v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Denman v. Carroll Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Holzapfel v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Tate v. Butler Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Wood Cty. Dog Warden v. LathropOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Coykendall v. Lucas Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018