Legal Opinion

Allison v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1977No. 1-1275A241PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Robert H. Allison, alleging that an adverse Motion for Judgment on the Evidence should not have been granted at the close of the presentation of his evidence in a jury trial.

On January 15, 1968, Allison was employed by Sink & Edwards, a sub-contractor of defendant Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. (Huber-Hunt) was át the time constructing buildings for General Motors in Indianapolis. Allison’s job on the day in question was to drill holes in the side of an air scrubber that was placed on the roof of one of the buildings under construction. The air scrubber was located…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Mamula v. Ford Motor CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Linton v. LintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Meadowlark Farms, Inc. v. WarkenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Sink & Edwards, Inc. v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Johns v. New York Blower Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API