Legal Opinion
Ex parte Hart
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 7, 1938No. 14615PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishburne.
On June 2, 1937, the appellants, W. E. Bowen and Dakyns B. Stover, County Attorneys for the County of Green-ville, which is embraced within the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, made an ex parte application to his Honor, T. S. Sease, resident Circuit Judge of the adjoining Seventh Circuit, at his chambers in Spartanburg, for an order authorizing the payment of extra compensation to them as such attorneys, under Section 33 of the Greenville County Supply Act (Acts 1937, page 1071). The petition presented to Judge Sease was accompanied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Watts v. DullIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Truesdell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Ex Parte PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Kaylor v. HillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HuttoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- DeWitt v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Ex Parte HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Ross v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.