Legal Opinion

State v. Hutto

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1968No. 18852PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

Defendant has appealed from her conviction, under Section 16-83 of the 1962 Code of Laws, of the crime of abortion, and from the revocation of a prior probationary sentence imposed for a similar offense.

The first questions to be decided concern the form of the indictment and sufficiency of the proof thereunder. Sections 16-82 and 16-83 of the 1962 Code of Laws deal with separate and distinct offenses of abortion. Section 16-82 “is directed to a case where a pregnant woman is aborted, or attempted to be aborted, and dies by reason thereof, or where a woman ‘quick with child’ is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parks v. Morris Homes Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. RickenbakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. SawickiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. State v. PittsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. KahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API