Legal Opinion

Gagos v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1934No. 5554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This case comes from the Industrial Commission of Utah upon an application for a writ of review, arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, § 3061 et seq., as amended). George Gagos was an employee of the Utah Fuel Company, working at Castle Gate, Utah.

Applicant, George Gagos, claims that he was injured by accident arising out of or in the course of his employment by a strain resulting in the development of a right inguinal hernia.

The defendant Utah Fuel Company, a selfinsurer, claims the hernia was not the result of an accidental injury.

The Commission…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McEwan v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Peterson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Harness v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gagos v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Strong v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Peterson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Pecharich v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Callahan v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API