Legal Opinion
McEwan v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1923No. 3974PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
This is a proceeding in certiorari to set aside an order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying plaintiff compensation for an injury alleged to have resulted from an accident arising in the course of his employment. After finding the jurisdictional facts the Commission found as follows:
“That on December 20, 1922, at the hour of 11 a. m., Robert H. McEwan, applicant, while lifting a large radiator, suffered a descent of the bowel into the scrotum, right side; that said descent was not a new condition, but had occurred many times previously; that the applicant had suffered from a right…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Patrick v. J. B. Ham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Puritan Bed Spring Co. v. WolfeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kutschmar v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Cherdron Const. Co. v. SimpkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Purity Biscuit Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Graybar Electric Co., Inc. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Utah-Idaho Central R. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Gagos v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Peterson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.