Legal Opinion
Cadena v. Pacesetter Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2000No. 99-3047, 99-3166PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
For four months, Lynn Cadena’s supervisor at work subjected her to severe sexual harassment. As a consequence, Cadena successfully sued her former employer, the Pacesetter Corporation (“Pacesetter”), for violating Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Pacesetter brought two separate appeals, which are now consolidated in the instant appeal. Pacesetter first challenges the underlying judgment, asserting the following arguments: (1) the district court erred in denying its post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law because no reasonable jury could…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Savin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Green v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Marjati Winarto v. Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Roger E.A. Taylor, Wayne Liem, Bill McKinley Ron Birtch, Nancy AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Renner v. Harsco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Mark J. Bruso v. United Airlines, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.