Legal Opinion
United States v. Schrum
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 4, 1980No. 79-40031-01, 79-40035-01, 79-40034-01, 79-40033-01 and 79-40032-01PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
The above-captioned cases come before the court by reason of the several defendants’ motions to dismiss indictments. Because the facts in each case are so similar, and the legal questions presented by the motions correspondingly akin, argument and decision on the motions has been consolidated.
In each case the defendant stands charged with criminal violations arising from the filing of false and fraudulent tax refund claims. Each defendant is presently incarcerated in the Kansas State Penitentiary at Lansing, Kansas, and was so incarcerated prior to November 6,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Leroy SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. SorrellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States v. Luis E. Chico and Gail A. ColelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Elias KenaanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- United States v. Michael RoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Charles E. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Larry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.