Legal Opinion

State v. Sorbel

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1993No. 19845PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Gregory Sorbel entered a conditional plea of guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to deliver, but expressly reserved his right to challenge the district court’s refusal to suppress evidence. The issues raised on appeal relate to the issuance and execution of a search warrant. Sorbel argues: (1) that the search warrant was issued without probable cause; (2) that the issuing magistrate was misled by the police; and (3) that the officers executing the warrant failed to comply with I.C. § 19-4409, the knock-and-announce statute. For reasons explained below, we affirm.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. LangIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. LindnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. CrabbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. HagedornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. CarlsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. Tami Marie SouthwickIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API