Legal Opinion
State v. Peterson
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 1999No. 24211PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
On this appeal Carl Allen Peterson challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in his residence and vehicles during the execution of search warrants. Peterson contends that in obtaining the initial warrant, a detective intentionally or recklessly misled the magistrate by omitting material information from the warrant affidavit. For that reason, he contends, evidence found in the execution of the initial warrant and subsequent warrants must be suppressed.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 11,1995, Clearwater County Sheriffs Detective…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LindnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. JosephsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SheldonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. LarsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. Zapata-ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. RounsvilleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.