Horan v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Board of Equalization
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A property owner and a borough property tax assessor each contend, for different reasons, that the superior court erred in affirming the borough board of equalization's final valuation for a low-income housing tax credit property. We affirm a portion of the superi- or court's legal rulings upholding the board's interpretation of the relevant appraisal statute and we affirm the superior court's legal ruling affirming the board's choice of appraisal methodology. But because we cannot discern (1) how the board treated relevant federal tax credits in its…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Alaska Laser Wash, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough AssessorAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Williams v. Muses, Ltd. 1Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Brandner v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.