Legal Opinion
Wagschal v. Sea Ins. Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1994No. 92 Civ. 2579 (RWS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Herman and Masha Wagschal (the “Wagschals”) have moved in limine for an order prohibiting Defendant The Sea Insurance Company, Limited (“Sea”) from using certain evidence at trial in this matter. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Parties
The Wagschals are residents and domiciliaries of the State of New York. Sea is a foreign corporation authorized to engage in the business of insurance in the State of New York.
Facts
In 1986, the Wagschals purchased a residence in Monsey, New York (the “Residence”). The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Chuckleberry Publishing, Inc., Publishers Distributing Corporation, Arcata Publications Group, Inc., Tattilo Editrice SpaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Hadi Zandi, United States of America v. Mehdi ZandiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Gladys Hall Hamrick Smith, Individually and as of the Estate of Bethel T. Smith, Deceased v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.