Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Martin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1988No. 67540PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This is a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding. See Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P.

*790Applicant alleged he was convicted of burglary of a vehicle on December 5, 1977, and that his punishment, enhanced by allegation and proof of two prior felony convictions, was assessed at life imprisonment. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 12.42(d), then in effect. In his habeas application he challenged the use of one of the prior convictions for enhancement of punishment, claiming it was a void conviction by reason of former jeopardy.

The prior conviction…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Keller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Stahle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  4. Breaux v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API