Legal Opinion
Ramiro Cruz Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1995No. 94-70094PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Ramiro Cruz Espinoza seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”’s') dismissal of his appeal of an immigration judge’s deportation order. Cruz Espinoza claims that the BIA erred in holding that an Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) form prepared by border agents who apprehended him was admissible at his deportation hearing and constituted clear and convincing evidence that he was deportable. We have jurisdiction under- 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we affirm.
I
On July 10, 1992, the INS apprehended Cruz Espinoza in California and issued an Order to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Shabanali Ladha Khatoon Ladha Farzana S. Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Oscar Rojas-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert S. Coleman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Santiago-Rodriguez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Abbas Zahedi v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.