Legal Opinion

Titus v. Braidfoot

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1933No. 6 Div. 261PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This appeal challenges the action of the trial court in granting a new trial for the giving of written instructions indicated at the request of defendant. If there was error in giving any of said charges, the action of the trial court in granting the motion for a new trial and setting aside the verdict for defendant was free from error.

The court instructed in the oral charge and written charges that Bessemer road at the place of collision was a boulevard, and subject to the laws governing boulevards, and there was no exception by plaintiff to such instruction. We take judicial knowledge of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Glenn v. City of PrattvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Lane v. City of TuscaloosaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FuquaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Ex Parte City of AlbanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Walls v. City of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Bell v. CrookNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rose v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Gross v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API