Rand v. Columbia Nat. Bank of Tacoma
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
These are two suits, one in equity and one at law, which grew out of the same transaction, and were tried together, and may therefore be disposed of by a single opinion, as they were by the trial court. 87 Fed. 520. In case No. 1,151, Alonzo *350T. Rand, Rufus R. Rand, and Kate Ogle, the appellants, sought to obtain a decree adjudging that they were not stockholders of the Columbia National Bank of Tacoma, Wash., hereafter termed the “Bank,” and an injunction restraining the prosecution of certain suits at law which had been brought against them by Phillip Tilling-hast, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Scott v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Columbia Nat. Bank of Tacoma v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Brown v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Rand v. Columbia Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bailey v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Ratcliff v. ClendeninCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- State Bank of Portland v. GotshallOregon Supreme Court · 1927