Rand v. Columbia Nat. Bank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
This was a suit in equity by Alonzo T. Rand, Rufus R. Rand, and Kate A. Ogle against the Columbia National Bank of Tacoma, Wash., Philip Tillinghast, its receiver, and James H. Eckels, as comptroller of the currency, to enjoin the prosecution of actions at law by said receiver to recover an assessment made by the comptroller on certain shares of the bank’s stock.
1Opinion of the Court
LOCHREN, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this suit alleges the organization of the defendant the Columbia National Bank of Tacoma, Wash., under the national banking laws of the United States on September 2, 1891, with a banking capital of $200,-000, divided into 2,000 shares of $100 each; and that on the 24th day of October, 1895, the defendant James H. Eckels, comptroller of the currency, took possession of said bank and its books and assets, and later transferred the same to the defendant Philip Tillinghast, whom he appointed receiver of said bank; and that said Eckels, as such…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Rand v. Columbia Nat. Bank of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Anderson v. BenedictDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1932