Legal Opinion

Columbia Nat. Bank of Tacoma v. Mathews

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1898No. 380PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the District of Washington. This case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the District of Washington. This case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. It appears from this statement: That the Columbia National Bank of Tacoma; plaintiff in error, was duly organized September 2, 1S91. That the articles of the association provide that the capital stock shall be $200,000, divided into shares of $100 each, and that the capital stock may be increased at any time by shareholders owning two-thirds of the stock, according to the provisions of the act of congress of May 1, 1886; and in case…

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(after stating the facts). . This action was brought by L. P. Mathews, the defendant in error, against the National Bank of Tacoma and Philip Tillinghast, its receiver, the plaintiffs in error, to establish his claim against them for the sum of $2,525, being .the amount paid by him on his subscription for the increased shares of stock, with interest. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled (77 Fed. 372), and upon issue joined the cause was tried before the .court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in error (79 Fed. 558). The right of Mathews to recover herein…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Deweese v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Bailey v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Aldrich v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Wallace v. HoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API