Legal Opinion

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Illinois

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 11, 1992No. 91-3114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Judgment in favor of the State of Illinois.

This cause is before the Court on the State’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), or for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

Because this Court will consider matters outside the pleadings, Defendant’s motion will be treated as a motion for summary judgment.

I. Facts

The EEOC has brought this suit against the State of Illinois challenging Ill.Rev. Stat. ch. 121, ¶ 307.12-1 (section 12-1), which sets the mandatory retirement age of Illinois State Police Special Agents at 60, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. William Lee Howland v. William Kilquist and Gene TruittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,905 Shirley Black v. Henry Pratt Company and Amsted IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. 61 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 117, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,040, 16 Employee Benefits Cas. 1748 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State of Illinois and Fraternal Order of Police, Troopers Lodge No. 41Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API