Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 16, 1993No. 92-2108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILL, Senior District Judge.

The EEOC brought this suit against the state of Illinois, charging that a mandatory retirement provision affecting Special Agents in the Division of Criminal Investigation violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a). Under the ADEA such a mandatory retirement provision is illegal unless it meets the exception of § 4(i) (29 U.S.C. § 623(i)). Under § 4(i) states and local governments that had mandatory retirement laws for law enforcement officers and firefighters in effect on March 3, 1983 are allowed to continue to enforce such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harriett L. McMillian v. Gerald N. Svetanoff, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Graczyk v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. IllinoisDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 61 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 117, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,040, 16 Employee Benefits Cas. 1748 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State of Illinois and Fraternal Order of Police, Troopers Lodge No. 41Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API