Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 3, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol GmbH, alleges that defendant, Omega Liner Company, Inc., has infringed two of its patents for inner films, also referred to as inner foils, used in ultraviolet cured-in-place pipe liners. Docket 1. Buergofol moves for a protective order relieving it of any obligation to respond to Omega’s Requests for Production 6, 7, 23, and 24 and Interrogatories 11 and 12. Docket 72 at 1.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anthony Fox v. Studebaker-Worthington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Carol L. Robinson v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Michael J. Badalamenti v. Dunham's, Inc., Kinney Shoe Corporation, and Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.