Legal Opinion
In Re Anagnostiadis
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 2001No. 99-BG-1113PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
In the face of disciplinary action but before any formal charges were filed, respondent Anagnostiadis consented to an indefinite suspension of his license to practice law in Maryland. The joint petition for indefinite suspension by consent, filed by respondent and Maryland Bar Counsel, stated that respondent was the subject of eight pending disciplinary matters alleging numerous ethical violations. 1 The petition also acknowledged that respondent was subject to further investigation by Maryland disciplinary authorities, upon review of financial records he agreed to provide, to determine…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AnagnostiadisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re BladesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re PowersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC v. Wonder World Learning, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC v. Wonder World Learning, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.