Legal Opinion

Pippin Bros. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1927No. 487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

Suit by appellee to recover money deposited under a contract for the sale of land by appellants to appellee, each of said parties having deposited $500. Ap-pellee alleged that appellants had breached the contract and that he was entitled to recover the entire deposits of $1,000 as liquidated damages, but alleged in the alternative that, in the event he was not entitled to recover the $1,000 as liquidated damages, he was entitled to recover the $500 deposited by himself, because the contract under which such deposits had been made was void for reasons set out by him, and, further, that said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Collier v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Yetter v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Moore v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Zucht v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Oetting v. Flake Uniform & Linen Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Smith v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API